💥Angel Reese Criticizes Sam Thomas’ All-Rookie Team Spot Over “Quadruple Decimals.P1

Angel Reese Sparks Controversy Over Sam Thomas’ All-Rookie Team Selection

Oct. 3, 2025 – New York, NY – Angel Reese, star forward in the WNBA, ignited a heated debate on Monday after publicly questioning the inclusion of rookie Sam Thomas on the league’s All-Rookie Team. The criticism, focused on Thomas’ statistical profile, has drawn widespread attention from fans, analysts, and players alike, highlighting ongoing discussions about how rookie performance is evaluated in professional basketball.

During a post-game interview following her team’s matchup in New York, Reese expressed disbelief that Thomas earned recognition based on highly granular statistical measurements, which she referred to as “quadruple decimals.” “It’s wild to see someone get recognized based on numbers that precise, rather than actual contribution on the court,” Reese said, her comments immediately resonating across social media platforms.

Thomas, a standout rookie guard, has impressed in certain efficiency metrics, showing promising potential in her first season. However, Reese’s critique suggests that statistical accomplishments, when broken down into extreme detail, may not always translate to real-world impact or team success. Analysts note that Reese’s remarks reflect a broader tension in modern basketball: the balance between advanced analytics and traditional evaluation of player influence, leadership, and intangibles.

The controversy comes at a time when the WNBA is experiencing growing attention to advanced statistics, mirroring trends in the NBA and other professional sports leagues. Teams increasingly rely on detailed metrics to assess players, including shooting efficiency, defensive impact, and contribution per possession. While such numbers offer valuable insight, critics argue that overemphasis on precise statistical minutiae can overshadow factors like teamwork, clutch performance, and adaptability under pressure.

Reese, known for her outspoken nature and leadership on the court, has long been a figure unafraid to address controversial topics in professional basketball. Her comments about Thomas are consistent with her broader reputation for advocating fairness, transparency, and accountability in evaluating player performance. “Stats are important, but basketball isn’t just about decimals,” Reese added during her interview. “It’s about impact, presence, and what you bring to your team day in and day out.”

Fans have reacted strongly to the statement, with social media platforms buzzing with debate. Some sided with Reese, agreeing that the All-Rookie Team should reward visible contribution and influence over highly technical measurements. Others defended Thomas, highlighting the modern game’s reliance on analytics and the importance of recognizing emerging talent based on measurable performance. The discussion has since expanded into a wider conversation about how the league honors young players and what criteria should define rookie excellence.

WNBA officials have not commented directly on Reese’s remarks, but the league’s All-Rookie Team selection process remains guided by a combination of statistical evaluation and votes from coaches and media members. The incident may prompt renewed scrutiny of the selection criteria and further dialogue on the intersection of analytics and traditional assessment.

As the 2025 season continues, both Reese and Thomas are expected to remain central figures in the league’s narrative. Reese’s outspoken critique has already influenced public perception, drawing attention to the nuances of player evaluation in a data-driven era. Meanwhile, Thomas’ rookie campaign continues under close observation, with her performance on the court likely to shape opinions regarding the legitimacy of her All-Rookie Team honors.

Ultimately, the debate sparked by Reese underscores a broader trend in professional sports: the ongoing negotiation between numbers and narrative, metrics and moments. As the WNBA grows in visibility and sophistication, conversations like these highlight the challenges of balancing statistical insight with the human elements that make basketball compelling to players and fans alike.