Forbes didn’t just release a ranking — they dropped a nuclear device straight into the heart of women’s basketball. In a stunning shake-up, the publication vaulted Caitlin Clark into territory usually reserved for billionaire owners and Fortune 500 power brokers, placing her at No. 4 on its list of the Most Powerful Women in Sports. Clark didn’t just top the athlete category; she leap-frogged executives, moguls, and long-established industry leaders. It’s the kind of ranking that doesn’t just spark conversation — it triggers a full-blown cultural earthquake.
And then came the money numbers.
If the ranking was the bomb, the income comparison was the shockwave. According to reports circulating online, Clark pulled in 115 times Angel Reese’s salary in a single year. Not ten times. Not twenty. One hundred and fifteen. Suddenly, what had once been a thrilling basketball rivalry has morphed into a conversation about power, influence, equity — and ego.
That’s where the firestorm truly ignited.
Multiple sources close to Angel Reese claim the Chicago Sky star “lost it” when she saw the Forbes list. According to these accounts, Reese allegedly called the ranking “disrespectful,” “rigged for golden girls,” and blasted it as another example of how media outlets elevate certain faces while undervaluing the athletes who actually drive the culture. One insider described her as “furious,” insisting Reese believes she is the engine behind the rivalry, the numbers, the viral moments, and the meteoric rise of women’s basketball.
“WITHOUT ME THERE IS NO RIVALRY, NO RATINGS, NO VIRAL MOMENTS,” she reportedly vented to her circle.
“IF THAT’S THEIR POWER RANKING, THEN IT’S A JOKE.
I’M THE ONE THEY COPY. I’M THE ONE THEY TALK ABOUT.”
Whether the quotes are fully accurate or exaggerated by the internet echo chamber, one thing is undeniable: the public bought into the drama instantly. Social media exploded into chaos within minutes — fans, analysts, influencers, even former players all diving headfirst into the debate. Some argued that Forbes simply measured business power, not cultural power. Others said Reese had every right to feel slighted after carrying half the league’s viral footprint on her shoulders for two straight seasons.
Meanwhile, Clark’s camp has remained silent, a silence that only adds gasoline to an already raging discussion.
Is the Forbes list the final blow that fractures the rivalry once and for all?
Or does it mark the moment the feud evolves from basketball into something far bigger — a clash over image, marketability, and who truly defines the future of women’s sports?
Because the question isn’t just whether Caitlin Clark deserves her new spot among the ultra-elite.
The question — the one blowing up every corner of the internet — is this:
Did Forbes just crown the wrong queen of power?
Leave a Reply