In an earth-shattering development for women’s basketball, WNBA stars Kelsey Mitchell and Sophie Cunningham have officially signed with the controversial new sports venture, Project B. The announcement, confirmed late Wednesday, sent shockwaves through social media and left fans of the league reeling. Both players reportedly secured contracts worth $2 million each, along with part-ownership stakes in Project B — a combination that’s nearly impossible to resist for any professional athlete looking to secure both financial reward and long-term influence.
Mitchell, a dynamic guard known for her scoring prowess, and Cunningham, celebrated for her versatility on both ends of the court, are among the WNBA’s brightest talents. Their departure raises uncomfortable questions about the stability of the league and whether more players might follow suit. Speculation is already swirling: is this the beginning of a mass exodus that could reshape professional women’s basketball in the United States?
Industry insiders suggest that the allure of Project B goes far beyond the eye-popping salaries. “This isn’t just about money,” one anonymous WNBA executive told us. “Players are getting a real stake in the business. That’s power. That’s ownership. And it’s something the WNBA hasn’t been able to offer in the same way.” With partial ownership, Mitchell and Cunningham now have not just a contract, but a voice in shaping the future of a high-profile sports project — a level of influence that’s historically rare in women’s professional leagues.
Social media erupted within minutes of the announcement. Fans expressed shock, disappointment, and in some cases, anger, with hashtags like #WNBAExit trending nationwide. Analysts immediately began dissecting the implications, debating whether the league can sustain its top-tier talent if Project B continues to lure players with lucrative financial packages and equity stakes. “We’re seeing a new model of athlete empowerment,” said sports business commentator Rachel Meyer. “This could be transformative — but for the WNBA, it’s a wake-up call.”
While many WNBA loyalists mourn the loss of two marquee players, there’s no denying the logic from Mitchell and Cunningham’s perspective. Securing multi-million-dollar contracts and a foothold in a promising new venture represents not only financial security but a chance to influence the direction of the sport in ways that were previously unimaginable. As one fan noted on Twitter, “If I were them, I’d take the deal too — can’t blame them for thinking long-term.”
The move also shines a spotlight on Project B itself, a venture shrouded in both excitement and controversy. Little is known about the league’s full structure and schedule, but insiders hint at high-profile exhibitions, global marketing strategies, and a focus on merging sports with business opportunities for athletes. For Mitchell and Cunningham, the timing appears perfect: they’re leaving the WNBA at a moment when their marketability is peaking and the Project B deal could set them up for long-term wealth and influence.
For the WNBA, the questions loom large: Can the league retain its stars? Will more players follow Mitchell and Cunningham into new ventures offering both cash and ownership? And perhaps most importantly, how will fans react if their favorite players continue to leave? One thing is certain — the landscape of women’s professional basketball is changing, and the next few months could redefine the sport forever.
Fans, pundits, and insiders alike are watching closely. The next chapter in this unfolding story promises drama, controversy, and potentially a seismic shift in the way women’s basketball operates. Could this mark the beginning of the end for the traditional WNBA model — or will the league adapt and fight back? Only time will tell, but one thing is clear: the Mitchell-Cunningham move to Project B has ignited a firestorm that shows no signs of cooling.
Leave a Reply