The NBA is facing one of its gravest integrity crises yet — court documents now show that the scandal sprawling across the league includes wagers made on a March 24, 2023 game between the Chicago Bulls and Portland Trail Blazers.
According to federal filings, those in the betting ring placed large sums after receiving insider information that the Trail Blazers planned to rest several key players and were essentially preparing to lose — before the public ever knew. The Blazers did lose that night by 28 points, an outcome flagged as suspicious given the prior information disclosed.
Investigators say this isn’t a one-off. The investigation covers multiple games over the 2022-24 period, in which insiders shared non-public details — upcoming injuries, player exits, lineup changes — that enabled bettors to place prop bets with an unfair advantage.
Among the worst-case scenarios, the March 24, 2023 game is now being treated as a watershed moment: insiders allege that a Blazers insider (identified only as “Co-Conspirator 8” in the documents) tipped off bettors in advance that the team’s stars would sit out. That person matches the profile of Chauncey Billups — Hall of Famer and now-head coach of the Trail Blazers — though he has not yet been formally charged in that specific game.
The ripple effects are enormous. The NBA and its teams are scrambling to assess the damage while fans and stakeholders alike ask: if insider betting reached this magnitude, what else is hidden behind closed doors? One former case involving Jontay Porter already resulted in a lifetime ban from the league — and this scandal promises to be even larger.

From Chicago’s vantage point, the Bulls were, at first glance, simply winners on that night. But now the spotlight on that game paints them as the unwitting endpoint of a cascade of clandestine activity. They were facing a Blazers squad alleged to be compromised ahead of time. The true question: did the Bulls realise they were part of something far bigger than a routine loss?
Legal experts warn that if the allegations are borne out, those involved face decades of penalties. For the league, the consequences could include reputational damage that reverberates beyond this season, shaking trust among fans, sponsors, and partners. The kinds of bets placed — though normally legal — became illicit when paired with insider intelligence.
For bettors, the scenario is haunting: imagine having information no one else has, knowing a star won’t play, or a team is tanking — and placing bets accordingly. That’s precisely what prosecutors allege took place. In the March 24 game, the Blazers team announced multiple starters would not play, bettors knew it ahead of time, and large sums were placed with foresight.
The league’s reaction has been swift but cautious. The NBA has placed implicated individuals on administrative leave and says it will cooperate fully with federal investigators. But many around the sport say this is far from the end. Buffett-style scrutiny is now focused on prop bets, player availability, and the opaque intersections of gambling and professional sports.
For Chicago, the forensic spotlight will remain trained on that March 24 contest: lineup sheets, communications, betting logs, and internal memos will all be combed over. If more evidence emerges that insiders fed bettors ahead of the game, the Bulls’ role — albeit passive — becomes part of a larger web of collusion.
As fans tune in for the next tip-off, the question hanging over every game is now: can we believe what we’re watching? Because if the Chicago showdown was manipulated, then perhaps nothing in this league is as it appears. And for the NBA’s future, that uncertainty may be its greatest challenge.
Leave a Reply