“Candace Owens’ conspiracy claims about Charlie Kirk’s death grow wilder, now accusing his wife Erika of prior knowledge, drawing backlash from Laura Loomer.” H1

Shock and disbelief ripple through conservative circles as Candace Owens pushes her most explosive theory yet about Charlie Kirk’s death. In a stunning twist, Owens has now accused Kirk’s wife, Erika Frantzve, of having prior knowledge of the tragedy — without providing any credible evidence to support the claim.

Owens made the accusation during a recent social media livestream, suggesting that “certain people close to Charlie” had “information they aren’t sharing.” The statement immediately went viral, triggering outrage across right-wing networks and deepening divisions within the conservative movement.

Prominent conservative commentator Laura Loomer swiftly condemned Owens’ remarks, calling them “vile lies” and accusing her of “weaponizing grief for clicks.” Loomer urged Owens to retract the statements and issue an apology to Erika Frantzve, warning that such baseless conspiracies risk tarnishing the legacy of one of conservatism’s most influential voices.

Even some of Owens’ longtime supporters have begun expressing unease, questioning her motives and her willingness to spread unverified claims for attention. The controversy underscores the widening fractures in conservative media and highlights a growing problem: the rise of internal conspiracy narratives that threaten to undermine the movement’s credibility.