“That’s Not Who I Am”: Chloe Bibby Apologizes for Endorsing Controversial Image Featuring Caitlin Clark and Sophie Cunningham
Indiana Fever guard Chloe Bibby issued a public apology on Saturday after posting, and then deleting, a controversial image featuring herself, Caitlin Clark, and Sophie Cunningham standing opposite a Black police officer. The post, which circulated quickly across X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and basketball fan forums, was met with immediate criticism for its perceived racial undertones.
In her statement, Bibby attempted to clarify her intent while acknowledging the hurt the image caused. “I’m really sorry if my post offended anyone. That’s not who I am. I need to do a better job at understanding the racial undertones, and I will,” Bibby wrote on her Instagram story. She confirmed that the post had been deleted and explained that the backlash had forced her to reflect on social media sensitivity and her own responsibility as a public figure.
The controversy erupted at a sensitive time for both Bibby and the Fever. The Australian-born player joined the Indiana roster earlier this summer, signing a hardship contract in July 2025. However, she has been sidelined since mid-August with a knee injury, limiting her chances to make an impact on the court. Now, instead of making headlines for her play, she finds herself at the center of a discussion about race, representation, and the power of images in the digital age.
The photo in question appeared to mimic a confrontation-like scenario, showing Bibby, Clark, and Cunningham positioned in opposition to a Black police officer. Critics argued that the visual carried echoes of long-standing racial tensions between law enforcement and minority communities in the United States. For many observers, the choice to post such an image—whether intended as satire, commentary, or simply humor—appeared insensitive at best, and racially charged at worst.
WNBA fans, many of whom have followed Clark’s meteoric rise as a rookie and Cunningham’s reputation as an outspoken competitor, quickly weighed in. Some expressed disappointment in Bibby, pointing to the league’s strong ties to social justice movements and its history of activism around racial equality. Others urged caution, noting that intent and context can often be lost in online exchanges.
Still, the general tone of the response suggested that Bibby had struck a nerve in a league and a sport where racial dynamics are frequently under the microscope. “For an athlete to share something like this, even without thinking, shows how important education on these issues really is,” one fan wrote in a widely shared comment.
Bibby’s apology, while swift, underscored a broader reality: professional athletes today are not only judged by their on-court performance but also by their digital footprints. Social media has become an extension of their brand, amplifying both their voices and their mistakes. The Fever guard acknowledged this, writing that she would use the incident as a learning opportunity.
This is not the first time racial sensitivity has surfaced in connection with the Fever this season. Earlier in the summer, a heated exchange during a game between Sophie Cunningham and an opposing fan drew attention for the way race and confrontation were perceived in public arenas. The fact that Bibby’s post visually echoed those tensions only deepened the backlash.
While some fans have accepted Bibby’s apology, others remain skeptical, questioning whether a single statement can undo the damage of what they view as a careless and racially insensitive act. The Fever organization has not yet issued an official comment, but league insiders suggest the team will likely address the matter privately with the player.
For Bibby, the incident is an early and difficult lesson in the realities of life as a WNBA athlete in the social media era. As she works toward recovery from her knee injury, she must also repair her reputation, rebuild trust with fans, and demonstrate that her words about learning and growth translate into meaningful action.
Whether this controversy becomes a footnote in her career or a defining moment will depend largely on how she responds in the weeks ahead. For now, her message is clear: “That’s not who I am.”
Leave a Reply