Independent tests suggest the reported rifle and distance don’t add up, hinting at hidden angles and unexplained factors. Could the official story be far from the truth?giang
Independent tests suggest the reported rifle and distance don’t add up, hinting at hidden angles and unexplained factors. Could the official story be far from the truth?
Shøcking new tests suggest that the official story of Charlie Kirk’s shooting may not be what it seems. Independent ballistics experts report that replicating the shot from the reported distance is nearly impossible—raising serious questions about the original narrative. Some sources hint there may have been interference from unexpected angles, making the true sequence of events far more complex. Could the reality behind this tragedy be very different from what the public has been told? Read the full investigation to see why experts are calling for a deeper look at the evidence and what it could mean.
Leave a Reply