The investigation into Charlie Kirk’s passing is intensifying with the analysis of new theories and visual evidence contradicting key aspects of the official narrative, focusing on protective gear, projectile trajectory, and the possibility of the shot originating from behind the stage or a nearby vehicle.

---

Debunking Key Protective Theories

Analysis of high-definition photographs captured by photojournalist Charles McClintoch Wilson on September 10, 2025, provides visual evidence to address two persistent theories:

Firstly, close-up images clearly show Charlie Kirk’s chest and long chain, confirming that he was not wearing body armor or any protective vest substantial enough to stop a high-velocity projectile. The theory that the bullet was deflected by body armor is visually disproved.

Secondly, close-up shots of Kirk while speaking confirm he was not wearing an earpiece or any visible wires running up his shirt or to his ear. While a person next to him is clearly seen wearing an earpiece, Kirk had no visible communication device.

---

Projectile Trajectory and Multiple Shots Theory

An anonymous video analysis interprets footage showing the projectile’s movement, suggesting complexity that the official “lone shot” narrative may not cover.

The analysis of the alleged first object or bullet captured in footage suggests it was moving away from Charlie Kirk (from left to right on the screen) before the impact occurred. The impact, marked by the shirt puffing out, appeared to happen two frames after the initial projectile passed.

If this interpretation is accurate, it suggests that the initial object captured was a bullet flying past, and a separate, subsequent shot was the one that actually impacted Kirk. This supports the theory that there were potentially multiple shots or multiple shooters involved.

Evidence of a Shot From Behind and Backdrop Breach

New evidence and analysis from the mystery investigator, “Cali Cukul,” reinforce the theory that the shot originated from the rear, likely through the tent backdrop.

Footage analyzed by Cali Cukul and a subscriber (“Miss C”) shows flashes visible in the reflection on a phone screen held by an individual near Charlie Kirk at the moment of the shot. The reflections point into the open tunnel behind the stage, suggesting a flash/muzzle blast occurred in the tunnel, supporting the theory of a shot from the rear.

Cali Cukul also noted a disturbance on the black backdrop where it meets the roof of the tent. A small black fragment (possibly a clip holding the backdrop) flies erratically away immediately after the shot. This analysis suggests a bullet might have passed through the backdrop, straining the clip and causing it to break, thus supporting the “shot from behind” theory.

---

The Suspicious Vehicle and Scene Reconstruction

New observations focus on a vehicle and individuals’ movements near the rear of the stage, suggesting a possible assassination attempt from that location.

Individuals were observed repeatedly leaning into or looking inside the trunk of a specific vehicle, identified as a Chrysler Pacifica, parked near the tent. The rear seats of this type of vehicle can be folded or removed to create a large open space, which could potentially serve as a hideout or a firing platform.

A police officer and a security guard were seen continuously ushering people away from the trunk area of the car both before and after Charlie Kirk’s arrival, suggesting the area was being actively secured.

Furthermore, a man setting up Charlie Kirk’s chair was allegedly seen looking towards the vehicle while positioning a low tripod, potentially checking the line of sight.

Another security guard was seen holding the chair in place until Kirk sat down, possibly to ensure he was in the exact spot required for the shot (line of sight). Reconstruction suggests a clear line of sight from the position of the vehicle to where Charlie Kirk was sitting.